[SystemSafety] Spanish train crash

Chris Dale chris.dale at scsc.org.uk
Mon Jul 29 17:38:31 CEST 2013


Thank you, Peter.

 

Surely the lesson of the Morpeth derailments is that speed limits on tight
curves need to be enforced technologically, not merely procedurally by the
imposition of speed limits.

 

According to Prof. Roger Kemp of Lancaster University, quoted by MSN, the
accident in Spain occurred on a section of ‘half completed’ track that was
still being brought up to date with the safety standards of the European
Rail Traffic Management System, which would have prevented the train from
exceeding the speed on the section of track.
http://news.uk.msn.com/world/why-spains-horror-train-crash-cant-happen-in-th
e-uk569032

 

If this is true, the driver should not be the only one under investigation.

 

Chris Dale

(also speaking for himself only)

 

From: systemsafety-bounces at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
[mailto:systemsafety-bounces at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de] On Behalf Of
peter.sheppard at uk.transport.bombardier.com
Sent: 29 July 2013 13:35
To: systemsafety at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
Subject: Re: [SystemSafety] Spanish train crash

 


I have just one comment - "Morpeth" 1969, 1984, 1994! 

Cheers 

Peter 
(Speaking on behalf of himself only) 

Peter Sheppard
Senior Safety Engineer and Validator

Mobile: +44 7920 247931
 
 
Please consider the environment before you print / Merci de penser à
l'environnement avant d'imprimer / Bitte denken Sie an die Umwelt bevor Sie
drucken 

Bombardier Transportation UK Ltd 
Registered Office: Litchurch Lane, Derby, DE24 8AD, England 
TEL +44 1332 344666, FAX +44 1332 266271 
Registered in England 
Registration No. 2235994 







"Chris Dale" <chris.dale at scsc.org.uk> 
Sent by: systemsafety-bounces at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de 
29/07/2013 12:41 


To

<systemsafety at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> 


cc

	

Subject

Re: [SystemSafety] Spanish train crash

 

		





PBL wrote:

> 11. I read in the Observer (Sunday paper of the Guardian group) that the
driver
> has been arrested, arraigned in handcuffs before a judge, and charged with
> multiple manslaughter.
>
> That is, of course, an excellent way to ensure that investigators (of any
kind)
> obtain minimal useful information about any human factors at play in this
> accident. Indeed, the article reports that he has received legal advice
not to
> make a statement to police.

Hear, hear!

If some technological failure caused the accident, we need to know.

If some technology misled, confused or distracted the driver at a critical
moment, we need to know.

If some technology that should have intervened was absent, switched off, or
otherwise ineffective, we need to know.

The (seemingly) media-led frenzy to find someone to blame is an obstacle to
the prevention of future accidents. Even if the technology is not at fault,
we should still be asking what would lead an experienced, well-qualified
driver to act (or not act) in the way he did. Then we have a chance of
improving things. We won't if the 'blame game' takes priority.

Chris Dale
Safety-Critical Systems Club Meetings Co-ordinator

chris.dale at scsc.org.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1326 565758
Mobile: +44 (0)7904 056507
www.scsc.org.uk

Director
Dale Research Ltd
2 Reppersfield Row, Breage, Helston TR13 9PG
Registered in England and Wales no: 4937941




_______________________________________________
The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE







____________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________ 
This e-mail communication (and any attachment/s) may contain confidential or
privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) or entity
named above and to others who have been specifically authorized to receive
it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or
disclose the contents of this communication to others. Please notify the
sender that you have received this e-mail in error by reply e-mail, and
delete the e-mail subsequently. Please note that in order to protect the
security of our information systems an AntiSPAM solution is in use and will
browse through incoming emails. 
Thank you. 
____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________ 

Ce message (ainsi que le(s) fichier(s)), transmis par courriel, peut
contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou protégés et est destiné à
l’usage exclusif du destinataire ci-dessus. Toute autre personne est, par
les présentes, avisée qu’il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si vous l’avez reçu par inadvertance, veuillez
nous en aviser et détruire ce message. Veuillez prendre note qu'une solution
antipollupostage (AntiSPAM) est utilisée afin d'assurer la sécurité de nos
systèmes d'information et qu'elle furètera les courriels entrants.
Merci. 
____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________ 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20130729/bf933686/attachment.html>


More information about the systemsafety mailing list