[SystemSafety] FMEA draft international standard

Matthew Squair mattsquair at gmail.com
Wed Jul 16 12:58:16 CEST 2014

And another thing.

There's already standards released and available for FMEA, see the SAE's J
standard, and the venerable MIL-STD-1629. So why do we need another? Before
we go gaily skipping down the primrose path of generating another
 standard, perhaps someone could state clearly why these are inadequate and
clearly define what the hoped for improvement is?

I haven't seen pictures in the news of crowds of angry RAM engineers
besieging their local standards organisations, angrily waving FMEA reports
in the air and demanding action to include 'C' into the acronym.

Matthew Squair

MIEAust, CPEng
Mob: +61 488770655
Email; Mattsquair at gmail.com
Web: http://criticaluncertainties.com

On 16 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Rob Alexander <rob.alexander at york.ac.uk> wrote:

Hi Drew, all,

On 16/07/2014 11:10, Andrew Rae wrote:

Standards processes seldom have an easy way for people outside the

immediate process to say "You're whole approach to this is wrong".

They're much more suited to complaining about how specific bits are

expressed, on the assumption that the overall framework makes sense.

Is that intentional, do you think? It sounds like a good defence mechanism.


Dr Rob Alexander
Lecturer in High Integrity Systems Engineering
Department of Computer Science
The University of York, Deramore Lane, York, YO10 5GH, UK
Tel: 01904 325474  Fax: 01904 325599  http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/~rda/

Disclaimer --- http://www.york.ac.uk/docs/disclaimer/email.htm
The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20140716/919eee12/attachment.html>

More information about the systemsafety mailing list