[SystemSafety] FMEA draft international standard
mattsquair at gmail.com
Wed Jul 16 12:58:16 CEST 2014
And another thing.
There's already standards released and available for FMEA, see the SAE's J
standard, and the venerable MIL-STD-1629. So why do we need another? Before
we go gaily skipping down the primrose path of generating another
standard, perhaps someone could state clearly why these are inadequate and
clearly define what the hoped for improvement is?
I haven't seen pictures in the news of crowds of angry RAM engineers
besieging their local standards organisations, angrily waving FMEA reports
in the air and demanding action to include 'C' into the acronym.
Mob: +61 488770655
Email; Mattsquair at gmail.com
On 16 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Rob Alexander <rob.alexander at york.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Drew, all,
On 16/07/2014 11:10, Andrew Rae wrote:
Standards processes seldom have an easy way for people outside the
immediate process to say "You're whole approach to this is wrong".
They're much more suited to complaining about how specific bits are
expressed, on the assumption that the overall framework makes sense.
Is that intentional, do you think? It sounds like a good defence mechanism.
Dr Rob Alexander
Lecturer in High Integrity Systems Engineering
Department of Computer Science
The University of York, Deramore Lane, York, YO10 5GH, UK
Tel: 01904 325474 Fax: 01904 325599 http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/~rda/
Disclaimer --- http://www.york.ac.uk/docs/disclaimer/email.htm
The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the systemsafety