[SystemSafety] Does "reliable" mean "safe" and or "secure" or neither?

Peter Bernard Ladkin ladkin at rvs.uni-bielefeld.de
Sat Apr 23 20:26:49 CEST 2016


On 2016-04-23 19:43 , Nick Tudor wrote:
> DO-178C

In the absence of a complete sentence, let me suggest one.

---- DO178C sees no need to assign any meaning to the term "software reliability".

It's fine for some industry consortium to find it has no use for a specific concept. RTCA likely has
no use for the notion of a cup of tea, either (BS6008). But that doesn't mean it makes any sense to
argue that there isn't any such thing as a cup of tea.

PBL

Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, 33594 Bielefeld, Germany
Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319  www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20160423/a717235c/attachment.pgp>


More information about the systemsafety mailing list