[SystemSafety] Collected stopgap measures

Tim Schürmann tschuerm at techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
Thu Nov 1 18:37:05 CET 2018


>From the viewpoint of somebody still in the beginning:

I wold love to have something like this.

May it even be just a list of references, papers, "does and don't does"
or alike..

Kind regards

Tim


On 01.11.2018 16:34, Olwen Morgan wrote:
>
> One thing that I sense (maybe wrongly?) from recent traffic is that a
> goodly few of us use our own favourite techniques to help plug the
> holes in weak development practices. Cut-down structured and OO
> methods seem to be a case in point. I'm sure there are others.
>
> Might there be some benefit in gathering here the tricks that many of
> us may have used when faced with inadequate processes. Call me
> simple-minded (many have called me worse) but I'm wondering if there
> would be value in what might be called a "Software Process Cookbook"
> of "Software Process Checklists" for high-integrity developments.
>
> True, I'd prefer something direct, technical and possibly rather dry
> but I'm thinking here about an appealing format. I'm wondering if
> something like a cookbook or "for Dummies" format would appeal to
> people who would otherwise never go near the sources that they need to
> be accessing to help them do the job better.
>
>
> Just a thought,
>
> Olwen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/listinfo/systemsafety



More information about the systemsafety mailing list