[SystemSafety] Fetzer

[Martyn Thomas]

Bev

I agree, of course.

There's a lot bound up in your phrase "in appropriate circumstances" ...

Martyn

On 20/06/2019 15:53, Littlewood, Bev wrote:
> Hi Martyn
>
> Your comment about claims based on process conformance is spot on. But
> I think you may be too harsh on testing. Testing may, in appropriate
> circumstances, allow justifiable probabilistic claims for reliability
> - something I don’t think you can get from verification (although this
> is not intended to be a criticism of the latter).
>
> Cheers
>
> Bev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20190620/eaff77cd/attachment.sig>