[SystemSafety] Putting Agile into a longer perspective

David MENTRÉ David.MENTRE at bentobako.org
Fri Oct 25 12:30:02 CEST 2019


Hello,

Le 24/10/2019 à 22:09, Steve Tockey a écrit :
> Therefore, if policy and process semantics were precisely and
> concisely specified and validated (using formalism set A) then it
> becomes clear and obvious to every single participant exactly what
> policy and process semantics are supposed to be automated in the first
> place. We can now focus exclusively on efficient and effective
> mappings (using formalism set B) of the given policy and process
> semantics onto the technology semantics. What used to be one big,
> hairy problem becomes two much simpler ones. Problem-space complexity
> is dealt with in formalism set A, solution-space complexity is dealt
> with in formalism set B. That is guaranteed to be a whole lot simpler
> than trying to manage the problem-space complexities and the
> solution-space complexities at the same time.

In an idealistic world, which formalism(s) would you use for "formalism
set A" and "formalism set B"?

Best regards,
D. Mentré




More information about the systemsafety mailing list