[SystemSafety] Technical information on Airbus A320 recall?
Prof. Dr. Peter Bernard Ladkin
ladkin at causalis.com
Sun Nov 30 18:03:35 CET 2025
On 2025-11-30 15:33 , Brian Jepson wrote:
> On 30/11/2025 14:07, Prof. Dr. Peter Bernard Ladkin wrote:
>> Which doesn't help answer David's question of how a pure *software* change can affect SEE
>> subsceptibility.
>
> Software cannot prevent SEE it can defend against the effects of an event.
>
It is clear to me that you can write SW which makes a computer more resilient to the effects of
SEEs. It is not at all clear to me how you can write SW which makes a computer more susceptible to
the effects of SEEs, except by removing code which made it so resilient in a previous version.
I guess one way might be that new software accepts a greater range of input values from sensors, so
that there is a greater range of input available for SEE corruption which affects program execution.
However, I don't see how reverting to a narrower range of inputs would help prevent SEE corruption
except in a purely statistical sense. So I wouldn't think that is what is going on in the current
situation.
PBL
Prof. Dr. Peter Bernard Ladkin
Causalis Limited/Causalis IngenieurGmbH, Bielefeld, Germany
Tel: +49 (0)521 3 29 31 00
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list