[SystemSafety] Functional hazard analysis, does it work?

David MENTRE dmentre at linux-france.org
Wed Jan 20 09:21:33 CET 2016


Hello,

Le 19/01/2016 08:49, Peter Bernard Ladkin a écrit :
> One way to formulate the criterion is to develop an ontology. The system consists of a collection
> of objects with properties and relations between them. List them. All. Then you can argue that
> functional hazards are those hazards which are expressible in that vocabulary and with a bit of
> luck and a lot of rigor you can list them all and show that you have done so.

Would you have a minimal example or a small reference I could look at to 
better understand your proposed approach?

Best regards,
david



More information about the systemsafety mailing list