[SystemSafety] Functional hazard analysis, does it work?
David MENTRE
dmentre at linux-france.org
Wed Jan 20 09:21:33 CET 2016
Hello,
Le 19/01/2016 08:49, Peter Bernard Ladkin a écrit :
> One way to formulate the criterion is to develop an ontology. The system consists of a collection
> of objects with properties and relations between them. List them. All. Then you can argue that
> functional hazards are those hazards which are expressible in that vocabulary and with a bit of
> luck and a lot of rigor you can list them all and show that you have done so.
Would you have a minimal example or a small reference I could look at to
better understand your proposed approach?
Best regards,
david
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list