[SystemSafety] Partly Off Topic: What Happens in October

SPRIGGS, John J John.SPRIGGS at nats.co.uk
Tue Oct 18 12:51:51 CEST 2016


I think you will find it is Andrew Wiles who has a Fields Medal; Andrew Wylie is The Jackal, apparently...

John

-----Original Message-----
From: systemsafety [mailto:systemsafety-bounces at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de] On Behalf Of Peter Bernard Ladkin
Sent: 18 October 2016 07:29
To: The System Safety List
Subject: [SystemSafety] Partly Off Topic: What Happens in October

Might it more appropriately be parsed as Partly-Off Topic than as Partly Off-Topic?

So what always happens in October? The Nobel Prizes and the SSCS.

First, Nobel.

It's grand to see a bard honored.
https://abnormaldistribution.org/index.php/2016/10/18/a-dylan-encomium/

It's also grand for this Brit, cognisant of the hitherto advantages of British academics, to see five Brits in four of the five science prizes. While the people are deserving, I don't think it's that Brits are smarter. It's that tertiary education allows exceptional talent more easily to develop to the standard of which it is capable.

But then, one notices. One Japanese, in Japan. Two Frenchmen, in France. One Dutchman, in the Netherlands. Five Brits - in the US (along with a Finn.) A half-century ago, we used to call it the brain drain. It hasn't stopped, and all indications are that it's about to get a lot worse.

Some people come back, Fields Medal winner Andrew Wylie, for example. Not a lot.

When I pointed this out, a colleague said "so what?" I think it's a big deal. I don't think either British science or European science is better off for many of its stars leaving. It's not symmetric travel, as it might be in a more balanced world.

It's not even symmetric inside Europe. The Anglo-American penchant for continued productivity even amongst the top research personnel, as well as humane academic career development prospects, have made UK academic careers attractive to Europe's best young scientists (not just scientists). That has put pressure on other national academic systems, such as the one I work in, to improve (that's partly why I'm here - but I think I came thirty years too early......enough said).

That appears about to end with a thud. As yet there aren't even any believable proposals for maintaining the status quo ante for those already in the UK. Sickening, and insulting. I guess it's what happens when you leave politics to politicians.  The rest of Europe is worse off, because the pressure is now off often dysfunctional and non-transparent national research systems to continue to clean up their collective acts in response to more attractive career conditions elsewhere.

Second, SSCS.

First, the non-news. Cybersecurity is a mess. We knew that, but we can divide it more finely.

There is the sociopolitical mess. The IPT has just ruled that GCHQ's data collection for most of the last two decades was illegal https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/17/uk-security-agencies-unlawfully-collected-data-for-decade
The solution? Make it now legal. That's all right then. I anticipate SSCS will continue to have almost nothing to say about all this. Where do we go for this debate? Chatham House? This shouldn't be left for politicians.

Then there is the technical mess. The good news may be that GCHQ, and now NCSC, has plenty of very smart technical people, one of whom, head of NCSC, gave a scintillating half-keynote following Martyn's first half. A lively and resounding start to the conference of the very first order.
Profuse thanks to both, and kudos to Carl for getting it to happen. This will be on IET.tv at some point. I do recommend people look at the video.

A hint for those concerned with Cyber Essentials, a British government computer security program.
Something I found out Wednesday - if you're one person or a couple of people running a standard OS with the delivered configuration of iptables, you don't leave a machine turned on when you're not using it, and you don't have NAS, then as long as you've changed the default PW on your router you probably qualify for Cyber Essentials. I didn't realise that. But don't quote me on these details - I am not a Cyber Essentials assessor.

The elephant in the room with me is how to reconcile the update cycles for safety and security.
Safety requires careful and thorough impact analysis before updating; security requires one react quickly to zero-day vulnerabilities. Anyone have any ideas about how to reconcile these? Nope. Not even when it's in the title of a talk. (Although Altran seems to have some technology that might help, which they didn't talk about here.)

I did learn something, though. Besides DIS IEC 62859 trying to do safesec for nuclear power plants and the NWIP for safesec of machinery now before the IEC, I learned about ISA 84.00.09-2013
https://www.isa.org/store/products/product-detail/?productId=118130  As usual it costs a lot of money, so I'm now trying to find a version it is within the scope of DKE to let me read.

PBL

Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany MoreInCommon Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319  www.rvs-bi.de

***************************************************************************
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify our Help Desk at Email information.solutions at nats.co.uk
immediately. You should not copy or use this email or attachment(s) for any purpose nor disclose
their contents to any other person.

NATS computer systems may be monitored and communications carried on them recorded, to 
secure the effective operation of the system.

Please note that neither NATS nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses or any losses
caused as a result of viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email
and any attachments.

NATS means NATS (En Route) plc (company number: 4129273), NATS (Services) Ltd 
(company number 4129270), NATSNAV Ltd (company number: 4164590) 
or NATS Ltd (company number 3155567) or NATS Holdings Ltd (company number 4138218). 
All companies are registered in England and their registered office is at 4000 Parkway, 
Whiteley, Fareham, Hampshire, PO15 7FL.

***************************************************************************


More information about the systemsafety mailing list