[SystemSafety] Bosch Political Viewpoint in IoT Cybersec
Martyn Thomas
martyn at thomas-associates.co.uk
Tue Sep 19 10:12:30 CEST 2017
That works, IFF manufacturers accept liability for the consequences of
security breaches that could have been avoided if they had used state of
the art software engineering (including formal methods) and IFF they are
willing to make the source code available to a plaintiff.
Martyn
On 19/09/2017 08:22, Peter Bernard Ladkin wrote:
> Just received this, from 10 July 2017.
>
> PBL
>
> Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany
> MoreInCommon
> Je suis Charlie
> Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs-bi.de
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20170919/afb5111f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 560 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20170919/afb5111f/attachment.sig>
More information about the systemsafety
mailing list