[SystemSafety] Bosch Political Viewpoint in IoT Cybersec

Martyn Thomas martyn at thomas-associates.co.uk
Tue Sep 19 10:12:30 CEST 2017


That works, IFF manufacturers accept liability for the consequences of
security breaches that could have been avoided if they had used state of
the art software engineering (including formal methods) and IFF they are
willing to make the source code available to a plaintiff.

Martyn


On 19/09/2017 08:22, Peter Bernard Ladkin wrote:
> Just received this, from 10 July 2017.
>
> PBL
>
> Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany
> MoreInCommon
> Je suis Charlie
> Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319  www.rvs-bi.de
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20170919/afb5111f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 560 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20170919/afb5111f/attachment.sig>


More information about the systemsafety mailing list