[SystemSafety] Report on Risks of UAVs in US NAS

[Matthew Squair]

Read the assumptions and guiding principles section to get a quick feel for
the agenda, I’m pretty sure this was not the report that the FAA was
looking for when they commissioned it.

On 20 June 2018 at 6:07:10 pm, Peter Bernard Ladkin (
ladkin at rvs.uni-bielefeld.de) wrote:

>
>
> On 2018-06-20 17:32 , Tom Ferrell wrote:
>
> Be that as it may, those of us who work in aviation safety must engage
> with the UAS community as
> this genie is not going back in the bottle.
>
> I suggest that there are (at least) two different ways of looking at this
> issue.
>
> One is the diplomatic way, which Tom suggests: here are the "others", they
> have their concerns,
> which we take as prima facie as legitimate as "ours"; we talk, we
> negotiate, something comes out.
>
> Another is as follows. "We" have certain principles, developed over nearly
> a century, which have
> over the long term ensured that NAS is now the safest transportation space
> ever, anywhere. (Other
> space, such as European airspace under some concept of "Europe", may be
> equally so.) Let us calle
> this the "civil airspace use system" (CAUS, to be distinctly pronounced
> from "chaos" by emphasising
> the "U"). Desired UAV operations violate various fundamental precepts of
> this CAUS. What are the
> consequences? Can violation of these precepts be mitigated?
>
> I prefer the second approach.
>
> PBL
>
> Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany
> MoreInCommon
> Je suis Charlie
> Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs-bi.de
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20180621/ce520409/attachment.html>