[SystemSafety] A Fire Code for Software?

[Andy Ashworth]

		I pointed out a number of examples of integrated behaviour but to no avail.
In order to preserve confidentiality, I will refrain from further specific comment on the project concerned. 
Andy

		Get Outlook for iOS
	





On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:15 AM -0400, "Fenn, Jane (UK)" <jane.fenn at baesystems.com> wrote:




















Hi


 


Did you try pointing out the Tacoma Narrows bridge to them…..


 


Jane


 





From: systemsafety [mailto:systemsafety-bounces at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de]
On Behalf Of Andy Ashworth

Sent: 08 March 2018 12:18

To: paul_e.bennett at topmail.co.uk; systemsafety at lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de

Subject: Re: [SystemSafety] A Fire Code for Software?




 



 






“ For a civil engineer, there is little or no need for them to consider integrated system behaviour - a tunnel, a bridge, or any other structure is largely passive when it comes to failure modes; whereas
 functional safety requires a more pro-active consideration of how things work and how they fail.”




 


















********************************************************************

This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended

recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended

recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.

You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or

distribute its contents to any other person.

********************************************************************






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20180308/7ec6c983/attachment.html>