[SystemSafety] The Importance of Standards

[Peter Bernard Ladkin]

Back in 2016, I wrote a short article comparing the approach of EUROCAE ED-153 to software safety 
and that of IEC 61508. It was presented at the 11th IET International Conference on System Safety 
and Cyber Security in 2016.

Papers weren't required to accompany talks. But I wrote the paper and it was duly "published" in 
that USB sticks containing written accompaniments to talks were distributed with the conference 
materials. (Martyn Thomas pointed to the irony of a Cyber Security conference distributing USB 
sticks without any kind of assurance.)

The proceedings are available. The IET offers them for sale for £79. 
https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/conferences?pageSize=100&page=1

Most academic publishers offer individual papers for sale. I do not agree with the kinds of prices 
they charge, but £79 is way above those prices.

I did approach the IET about this. They responded that individual papers are available at no charge 
to all IET members and affiliates (that is, people entitled to log in to IET on-line services). I 
guess that solves it for 160+K people.

But no one has to go that route. It's up on ResearchGate, a preprint+published-paper collector. 
ResearchGate informed me today that 6,000 people have read it.

That paper was written when I was a German public servant with my salary paid by German taxpayers, 
as also Managing Director of the tech-transfer company Causalis on whose behalf I donated it pro 
bono publicum. I do not agree with restricting its distribution. I want it to be open access and, 
thanks to ResearchGate and my still-maintained Uni WWW site (and its mirror, paid for by Causalis) 
it is.

The main point I wish to make is this. 6,000 people have wanted to know the similarities and 
differences between ED-153 and 61508. They have their reasons, and I surmise it is not because they 
find my paper more entertaining to read than Stephen King.

Engineering standards are a public good. Except they are not public.

We are currently running through the German comments on IEC 61508 Ed3 CD. We have had three full 
days of discussion, just on which ones to forward to the IEC and which ones not to, and a further 
three full days are planned. That is 300 person-days, just for that one task (and then there is the 
huge effort put in by particular people to collate and sort the comments and ease the discussion. I 
am currently in awe at the skill of one colleague who conducted yesterday's 7-hour meeting 
flawlessly, without apparently cognitively phasing in and out, probably beyond my capabilities.)

When this decade-long task is finally finished, the result will be proudly ........ sold by the IEC 
to anyone with CHF 1400. (And, may I say, actively copyright-protected.)

John Knight, RIP, Martyn Thomas and I have repeatedly expressed our discontent with this and other 
aspects of engineering standardisation https://scsc.uk/scsc-126

Standards are important. We need to move to a model in which they work as a public good.

PBL

Prof. i.R. Dr. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Bielefeld, Germany
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319  www.rvs-bi.de




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/pipermail/systemsafety/attachments/20221209/520457dc/attachment.sig>