[SystemSafety] a public beta phase ???

[Martyn Thomas]

On 17/07/2016 13:51, Peter Bernard Ladkin wrote:
> And we presume, or legislate, that the technology will be incrementally
> adapted to the "lessons learned" from these analyses. That will happen, because the alternative is
> that accidents are not investigated and lessons are not learned, and that is unacceptable.

Isn't there at least one step missing here? Isn't it necessary to have
adequate confidence (for some agreed meaning of 'adequate') that the new
technology, with the "lessons learned" will have fewer accidents than
the technology it replaces?

If that /is/ necessary, how could it be achieved?

Martyn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20160717/69c7cc34/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 560 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/private/systemsafety/attachments/20160717/69c7cc34/attachment-0001.pgp>