June 2013 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Jun 1 23:44:21 CEST 2013
Ending: Sat Jun 29 17:37:21 CEST 2013
Messages: 103

• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Robert Schaefer at 300
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Peter Bishop
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Peter Bishop
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Peter Bishop
• [SystemSafety] Call for Participation: HILT 2013 (High Integrity Language Technology)   Ben Brosgol
• [SystemSafety] qualification (was: Re: RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Gergely Buday
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Todd Carpenter
• [SystemSafety] Ross Anderson on Consequences of Surveillance   Les Chambers
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software] - Cyclomatic Complexity   Les Chambers
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software] & [THE DARK NIGHT OF THE SOUL]   Les Chambers
• [SystemSafety] Watch out for exploding ticket machines on German Railways!!   Robin Cook
• [SystemSafety] Ross Anderson on Consequences of Surveillance   Mike Ellims
• [SystemSafety] Who applies risk acceptance principles - Part 2   GRAZEBROOK, Alvery N
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Patrick Graydon
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Patrick Graydon
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   C. Michael Holloway
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   C. Michael Holloway
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   C. Michael Holloway
• [SystemSafety] Who applies risk acceptance principles - Part 2   ECHARTE MELLADO JAVIER
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Michael Jackson
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Derek M Jones
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use" - unclassified   King, Martin (NNPPI)
• [SystemSafety] Drone Airprox Video   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] RE : Drone Airprox Video   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] RE : Drone Airprox Video   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] Ross Anderson on Consequences of Surveillance   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] Privacy and Confidentiality   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Peter Bernard Ladkin
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Jean-Louis Letouzey
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Nancy Leveson
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Nancy Leveson
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Nancy Leveson
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Nancy Leveson
• [SystemSafety] FW: "Engineering a Safer World" class information for 2013   Loebl, Andy
• [SystemSafety] RE : Drone Airprox Video   Ganesh J. Pai
• [SystemSafety] Limitation of liability (was Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software])   Pekka Pihlajasaari
• [SystemSafety] CFP: European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC 2014)   Alexander Romanovsky
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   James Ronback
• [SystemSafety] RE : Drone Airprox Video   RICQUE Bertrand (SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE)
• [SystemSafety] RE : Drone Airprox Video   RICQUE Bertrand (SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE)
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   RICQUE Bertrand (SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE)
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   RICQUE Bertrand (SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE)
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   RICQUE Bertrand (SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE)
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   RICQUE Bertrand (SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE)
• [SystemSafety] qualification (was: Re: RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   RICQUE Bertrand (SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE)
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   RICQUE Bertrand (SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE)
• [SystemSafety] Who applies risk acceptance principles - Part 2   SPRIGGS, John J
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   SPRIGGS, John J
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   SPRIGGS, John J
• [SystemSafety] Software exam gets low grade in first test   Dick Selwood
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Matthew Squair
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Matthew Squair
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Matthew Squair
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Matthew Squair
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Matthew Squair
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Matthew Squair
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Matthew Squair
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Martyn Thomas
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Martyn Thomas
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Martyn Thomas
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Martyn Thomas
• [SystemSafety] qualification (was: Re: RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Martyn Thomas
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Martyn Thomas
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Martyn Thomas
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software] & [THE DARK NIGHT OF THE SOUL]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Steve Tockey
• [SystemSafety] RE : Qualifying SW as "proven in use"   Nick Tudor
• [SystemSafety] Who applies risk acceptance principles - Part 2   Thierry.Coq at dnv.com
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Thierry.Coq at dnv.com
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Thierry.Coq at dnv.com
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Thierry.Coq at dnv.com
• [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]   Thierry.Coq at dnv.com
• [SystemSafety] follow-up with results from earlier research survey request ....   bob.barnett at faa.gov
• [SystemSafety] Who applies risk acceptance principles - Part 2   nfr
• [SystemSafety] Software exam gets low grade in first test   Chuck_Petras at selinc.com
• [SystemSafety] Who applies risk acceptance principles - Part 2   peter.sheppard at uk.transport.bombardier.com

Last message date: Sat Jun 29 17:37:21 CEST 2013
Archived on: Fri Jul 12 15:13:29 CEST 2013

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...